- This topic has 7 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 1 month ago by
.
- Posts
Would love to get Biadasz, DS.
me too
http://cloudassetserver.com/STL/posts/185/sp_04_976x0.jpg
Love those 3 picks DS, any WR we take should be of that mold.
Allow me to disagree. I think our base set will be a 2 WR set with either a TE and FB or two TE’s on the field. Hooper and Njoku are both bigger receiver-type TE’s and grabbing a big, slow WR wouldn’t help us. I think we need a small burner type WR for those few times we do go 3WR sets (3rd and long) that can take the top off the defense and allow OBJ and Landry to do their thing. That 3rd receiver will have to learn 1 route and 1 route only; the 9 route.
Allow me to disagree. I think our base set will be a 2 WR set with either a TE and FB or two TE’s on the field. Hooper and Njoku are both bigger receiver-type TE’s and grabbing a big, slow WR wouldn’t help us. I think we need a small burner type WR for those few times we do go 3WR sets (3rd and long) that can take the top off the defense and allow OBJ and Landry to do their thing. That 3rd receiver will have to learn 1 route and 1 route only; the 9 route.
Which is EXACTLY why we need a Quez Watkins if we’re going to draft a receiver.
Am I going mad, or did the word THINK escape your lips? You were not hired for your brains, you hippopotamic landmass!
the burners are gone from what I can tell
Dang Raiders.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.