[Dawg E. Dawg]

So, this is interesting to me, because I was thinking the Browns were all in on Fitzpatrick at 4 until they traded fro Randall, who they’re saying will be moving back to his college position of safety.

Wit the Bills leaving themselves only Nathan Peterman at QB, they have to be in the market. With this move, it makes it a little more viable for the bills to trade up a get a qb, and the Browns at 4 are the most likely to trade back since they can already get the qb they need at 1. It’s at least interesting enough for me to consider what will be available at 12, which is a range I had previously ignored, mostly.

[mike barnes]

Or the bills could trade to #3 with the Colts, indy really needs o-line help to keep Luck upright, even if the gmen take a QB at #2 then Barkley drops to #3 so Indy might pull the trigger or trade with the Bills then we could have our choice between Barkley or Chubb not a bad place to be. If we trade #4 then I’d look for the Browns to be targeting o-line or the second tier edge rushers.

[DawgSoldier]

12 and 22 for 4 staright up IMO would be the worst case scenario if the Bills were trade up to 4. As far as worse case scenarios that one aint that bad.

http://cloudassetserver.com/STL/posts/185/sp_04_976x0.jpg

[Author]

Posts