Since I don’t know exactly what his input was or exactly what he did not to mention his strengths or weaknesses, I can’t say if he would be good or bad. I don’t know what he did when he was here. I don’t know what input he had or if he made good or bad decsions since he was behind the scenes. It isn’t like evaluating a OC or head coach when you…[Read more]

People will believe anything bad about the Browns based on past history.
As far as analytics goes, it is another tool that you use. It just puts numbers to trends. You analyze what a team might do in regards to down, distance and field position.
I am not hung up on it. You don’t base everything on it but utilize the information gleaned to call…[Read more]

I think Wilks did an excellent job last season. The roster was torn apart most of the year and we ended up starting some guys that are probably back to tending bar now. We played the first quarter of the season without our good CB’s, which might be why we played so much zone. Except for zone coverage, I thought the scheme was good and he got good…[Read more]

Stefanski called all the plays for the Vikings this year.

If you listened to his presser he talked a lot about coaching without ego. Doing what’s best for the team. It sounds like once his staff is assembled he’ll decide who is the best at it and they will do it.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/01/14/haslam-calls-report-hell-get-the-game-plan-inaccurate-and-irresponsible/

Responding to a report that Haslam told Stefanski that they’ll have weekly meetings on Mondays and that he has to turn the game plan into the owner on Fridays, Haslam said the first part is true but the second part is f…

[Read more]

But when they showed the plans to you, you could at least verify that there is a plan…

And the analytics team can at least tell that THIS wouldn’t be good:

Panthers also asked to interview Andrew Berry. The Eagles denied their request. That’s strange that they would allow him to interview with us for that position but not CAR.

You’re right, it’s stupid. They shouldn’t have to do it, it’s remedial shit.

Just like the sign on the McDonalds coffee cups that says “contents may be hot”. What kind of idiot doesn’t know that hot coffee might be hot? And yet someone didn’t think it was hot, spilled it on themselves, and sued for millions and won. So now every coffee cup…[Read more]

So if the owner asks for the game plan and the HC taps his own noggin and says ‘It’s all up here…’ that’s ok? Or if he turns in the Maurice Carthon playbook, that’s cool? If that’s the case then yes, scrap everything you worked on all week. How many games could have been won last season if this had happened?

Just trying to give you some…[Read more]

You have proven that indeed Kubiak was hired as an offensive consultant.

That’s what you were trying to prove, right?

For GM I want whichever guy makes Soup throw up in his mouth.

So I’m gonna play Devil’s Advocate.

1) One of the biggest issues with Freddie (this came straight from Landry’s mouth) was that there was no game plan every week. And even when there was, they didn’t follow it. I can see that being a big issue and Haslam doesn’t want that to ever happen again. So he wants to see that there is a plan and it makes…[Read more]

Ah the old “Kubiak’s Fingerprints” explanation. Very believable.

The only thing I didn’t like about Wilks was that we always played zone in the backfield. We’ve got 2 of the best young CB’s in the game who have excelled at man coverage their whole life.

That’s one way to look at it. Another way: ‘Their offense was heavy pass until Cook got healthy.’

Words are hard, huh? It doesn’t say they made their choice based on who won, it just says they were still deciding when the game was being played.

If they were deciding based on who won they would surely pick the winner, right?

Well this is the thread no one needed.

No more until the puke in the mouth video.

Following